Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56984 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94232 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2011 17:17:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Dec 2011 17:17:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=nikita.ppv@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=nikita.ppv@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: nikita.ppv@googlemail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.42 mail-lpp01m010-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.42] ([209.85.215.42:37238] helo=mail-lpp01m010-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5E/00-28003-EA412FE4 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:17:35 -0500 Received: by lagj5 with SMTP id j5so3147878lag.29 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:17:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e3T9+oI8N4i9pSJ6KMavtyhFtxjJndNv8vHCNwyMgS4=; b=bdnzM3IwYaI94f7EpYvEWDDZhUt+qtwqOHy/S3BwFGoKErqqGQkV6WDVnWYpGySjU7 arT8Uknd7HrWI6Dvd4Z074nIZhXJahWgaZwdhKTUNJvpa6JimAvDRy+3t6akYce8/DW3 6FC4G9q/1Jr0NBwiL7jnm3ZeAdlLznLT/JJ4g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.105.113 with SMTP id gl17mr6446534lab.25.1324487852001; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:17:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.108.110 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:17:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2095305E-D4E3-4D7E-8218-32EE99688E0C@GMAIL.COM> References: <2095305E-D4E3-4D7E-8218-32EE99688E0C@GMAIL.COM> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:17:31 +0100 Message-ID: To: Will Fitch Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Return Type Hinting for Methods RFC From: nikita.ppv@googlemail.com (Nikita Popov) Hi Will! One random thought I had while reading the RFC is: What about the newly introduced callable typehint? Is this missing by intention? I could well imagine so (because it's hard to check what scope callability should be checked on), but wanted to be sure on that. Nikita On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Will Fitch wrote: > Hello All, > > I would like to submit https://wiki.php.net/rfc/returntypehint2 into disc= ussion. =A0A link to the patch for this is provided and can be ran against = the current HEAD. > > There is an older entry still in existence, but this patch is syntactical= ly different. =A0The older entry is located at https://wiki.php.net/rfc/typ= echecking and is bundled with parameter, scalars, etc. > > If possible, can someone promote this to the "Under Discussion" category = within https://wiki.php.net/rfc? > > -- Will > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >