Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56924 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 51354 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2011 22:14:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Dec 2011 22:14:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.133 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.133 smtp133.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.133] ([67.192.241.133:43042] helo=smtp133.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A7/28-02473-2EF19EE4 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:14:58 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp23.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A44152F821B; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:14:55 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp23.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 51F902F822D; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:14:55 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4EE91FDE.1060005@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:14:54 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Fitch CC: Oleg Oshmyan , Derick Rethans , PHP Developers Mailing List References: <8D58A664-7250-4FEE-9424-2D2DEFC69308@inbox.lv> <1C397FE3-76E2-473B-B47F-194DAF3ACB39@inbox.lv> <4EE91556.3040909@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Local time zone From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I believe he's referring to sys/time.h, but this introduces > portability issues. If it were just unix, that would be one thing. > But maintaining this and a Windows alternative, and I have no idea > what that is, is not worth it IMO. Yes, portability is questionable. Though if we had a good patch that allows to do it, I don't think it would be too bad to have it. Even Unix-only might be (again, if enough people need it) fine, if we could use the data properly in timelib functions. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227