Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56879
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.42 as permitted sender)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <CAFp73XsjM8c=mwSGChVD+WmwiSWmAH=5LoBAvPSXx7=yqJsgmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 22:18:15 -0500
Cc: Clint M Priest <cpriest@zerocue.com>,
 Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>,
 "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <F3749BC8-3CFB-4A05-9865-5841F95E0617@gmail.com>
References: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485399554D7@MBX202.domain.local> <7070130643313812382@unknownmsgid> <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE4853995589C@MBX202.domain.local> <CAEZPtU5P60Xip0GbUD=YPoiUiV5sOYU2qeMfoUF=QhcokpBK5g@mail.gmail.com> <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE48539955910@MBX202.domain.local> <CAEZPtU6Hj4_bMM_L5xxOvAF6daqJHPGWcOzXreh-JAOtf5CZzQ@mail.gmail.com> <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE4853995598C@MBX202.domain.local> <CAFp73XsjM8c=mwSGChVD+WmwiSWmAH=5LoBAvPSXx7=yqJsgmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Accessors v2 Patch
From: will.fitch@gmail.com (Will Fitch)

This approach, in theory, is an interceptor itself.  Most use-cases =
around this approach will be changing or augmenting an existing property =
that is not public.  If you wanted to modify this interception, you'd =
need to extend the class using it and redefine the getter and/or setter. =
 =20


On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:02 PM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com wrote:

> I have just one question, partially unrelated.
>=20
> How can I make something similar to Interceptors of Java according to
> your approach?
> For those that have no idea, interceptors is a way to intercept
> get/set of a property inside the class and act under this
> circumstance.
>=20
> []s,
>=20
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Clint M Priest <cpriest@zerocue.com> =
wrote:
>> To be complete I should probably add something to the reflection =
system as well.  At present the getters/setters would show up as =
functions.
>>=20
>> What would be preferable?
>> 1) Show up as regular functions and let users fend for themselves?
>> 2) Hide from getMethods() and:
>>  2.1) Provide getAccessors() - Probably returning a new =
ReflectionPropertyAccessor class?
>>  2.2) Provide getGetters(), getSetters()
>> 3) Modify ReflectionProperty to include hasGetter() and hasSetter()
>>=20
>> Comments?
>>=20
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 6:47 PM
>> To: Clint M Priest
>> Cc: internals@lists.php.net
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Accessors v2 Patch
>>=20
>> oh right, I missed them. Yes, so it is covered as well :)
>>=20
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Clint M Priest <cpriest@zerocue.com> =
wrote:
>>> There are already two tests against private read and private write, =
should I add two for protected as well?
>>=20
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Pierre
>>=20
>> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
>>=20
>> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Guilherme Blanco
> MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
> GTalk: guilhermeblanco
> Toronto - ON/Canada
>=20
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>=20