Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56842 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91772 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2011 20:38:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Dec 2011 20:38:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 207.97.245.153 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 207.97.245.153 smtp153.iad.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [207.97.245.153] ([207.97.245.153:53195] helo=smtp153.iad.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 50/70-23442-4DECFDE4 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 15:38:44 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp25.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C31CA300753; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 15:38:41 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp25.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 68E86300595; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 15:38:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4EDFCED0.1020805@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:38:40 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Wallner CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4EC025B4.2070009@sugarcrm.com> <4EC17308.6030406@sugarcrm.com> <4EDE67D4.8040004@sugarcrm.com> <4E.00.23442.90DCFDE4@pb1.pair.com> In-Reply-To: <4E.00.23442.90DCFDE4@pb1.pair.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] function ob_gzhandler is missed in 5.4 From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > Note that despite I wrote the patch, I'm -1 on it, as stated in the > previous message in this thread. So what you prefer to do instead? I'd like to have ob_gzhandler(), but if you think it can be done better way, please advise. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227