Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56816 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40652 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2011 19:07:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Dec 2011 19:07:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.163 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.163 smtp163.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.163] ([67.192.241.163:39024] helo=smtp163.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 8C/51-30919-9D76EDE4 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:07:05 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp16.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C15874039D; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 14:07:02 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp16.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id A2C4540617; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 14:07:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4EDE67D4.8040004@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:07:00 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Grekas CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4EC025B4.2070009@sugarcrm.com> <4EC17308.6030406@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] function ob_gzhandler is missed in 5.4 From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I don't want anyone to take it personal... But what is the status about > missing ob_gzhandler function (but also ob_tidyhandler and > ob_iconv_handler) ? > > I put mike's patch and a comment to help track the BC break /potential > inconsistency : > > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=60326 Ah, I didn't realize this is patch from Mike. Let me take another look into it but I think it can be applied unless anyone sees anything wrong with it. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227