Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:5656
Return-Path: <pollita@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 91003 invoked by uid 1010); 21 Nov 2003 23:11:59 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 90969 invoked by uid 1007); 21 Nov 2003 23:11:58 -0000
Message-ID: <20031121231158.90968.qmail@pb1.pair.com>
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20031118235848.0347c9f0@127.0.0.1>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:10:16 -0800
Lines: 19
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Posted-By: 64.142.6.231
Subject: Re: E_STRICT
From: pollita@php.net ("Sara Golemon")

> I added an E_STRICT error level today which purists can use to make sure
> that there scripts are using the latest and greatest suggested method of
> coding (according to what we decide).
> Ideas are things like:
> a) Not using var for member variables but moving to PPP.
> b) Not using is_a but using instanceof.
>
> If you have any further ideas of stuff which makes sense to add to this
> option let me know. For obvious reasons this will be off by default.
>
Here's another:

$foo = "I am a string";

$firstchar = $foo[0];  /* As opposed to $foo{0} */

-Sara