Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56491 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 78491 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2011 09:37:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Nov 2011 09:37:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.203 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.203 smtp203.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.203] ([67.192.241.203:33630] helo=smtp203.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D6/55-45113-BBEBCCE4 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 04:36:59 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp20.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C06072581E1; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 04:36:56 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp20.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 5B702258215; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 04:36:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4ECCBEB7.6020609@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 01:36:55 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ferenc Kovacs CC: Gustavo Lopes , "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4ECC9ABE.1010709@sugarcrm.com> <4ECCBC37.9060106@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] intl IDNA patch From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I thought that we already agreed using an output argument for getting > the specific error instead of returning either a string or an array. That's what I was thinking too, but Gustavo seems to plan to do mixed return, which I think is a worse option. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227