Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56437
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485399328B6@MBX201.domain.local>
References: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485399328B6@MBX201.domain.local>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 06:43:34 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXbzAR5_mO8-VWRp2EVBOSGj2BpKjYoTPNqDgWQMrGSv3Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Clint M Priest <cpriest@zerocue.com>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Getters/Setters and parent getter/setter access
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

This is not a alternate syntax suggestion, but a currently working
solution (well partial)

<?phptrait Accessors{  public function __get($name) {    if
($this->r_property[$name])      return $this->$name;    else
trigger_error("Access to read protected property");}
public function __set($name, $value) {  if ($this->w_property[$name])
   $this->$name =3D $value;  else=A0    trigger_error("Access to write
protected property");}}
class OrderLine{  use Accessors;
  private $r_property =3D array('price'=3D>1, 'amount'=3D>1);  private
$w_property =3D array('price'=3D>1, 'amount'=3D>1);
  protected $price;  private $amount;
  public function getTotal() {    return $this->price * $this->amount;  }}
$line =3D new OrderLine;
$line->price =3D 20;$line->amount =3D 3;
echo "Total cost: ".$line->getTotal();?>

You might would like to add as a current solution.

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net



2011/11/19 Clint M Priest <cpriest@zerocue.com>:
> The RFC here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax
>
> Talks about allowing a sub-class to access a parent getter via TimePeriod=
::$Milliseconds or possibly parent::$Milliseconds.
>
> Either of those methods (currently) tries to access a static property in =
the parent or defined class. =A0It would probably break existing code if we=
 tried to make the parent:: or TimePeriod:: syntax to access the parent acc=
essor.
>
> Anyone have any suggestions on an alternative syntax?
>
> I'm sure I could change it so that parent:: or TimePeriod:: from within a=
 getter/setter would cause it to access the parent getter/setter but that w=
ould create an inconsistency within the language.
>
> Ideas?
>
> -Clint
>