Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56419 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 74856 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2011 01:46:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Nov 2011 01:46:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cpriest@zerocue.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cpriest@zerocue.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zerocue.com designates 74.115.204.80 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cpriest@zerocue.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.115.204.80 relay-hub206.domainlocalhost.com Received: from [74.115.204.80] ([74.115.204.80:15902] helo=relay-hub206.domainlocalhost.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 68/D0-00892-36A07CE4 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:46:12 -0500 Received: from MBX206.domain.local ([169.254.6.220]) by HUB206.domain.local ([74.115.204.80]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.001; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:46:08 -0500 To: "internals@lists.php.net" Thread-Topic: Multiple Visibility Level Getters/Setters Thread-Index: AcymXJz+NJwQSDzSQRSE1F1zSCB5GA== Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 01:46:09 +0000 Message-ID: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE48539811627@MBX206.domain.local> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.64.23] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE48539811627MBX206domainloc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Multiple Visibility Level Getters/Setters From: cpriest@zerocue.com (Clint M Priest) --_000_9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE48539811627MBX206domainloc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What would everyone think about multiple levels of visibility for getters/s= etters? class Sample { public $Variable { public get { return "Public"; } protected get { return "Protected"; } private get { return "Private"; } public set { ... } private set { ... } } } Whichever getter/setter would be called with the most restricted access, so= externally public, internally protected (if inherited) or private from wit= hin. Any value to this? I can see some use cases and wouldn't be any more diffi= cult to implement into what I'm already doing. -Clint --_000_9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE48539811627MBX206domainloc_--