Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56390
Return-Path: <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 59183 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2011 11:05:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 18 Nov 2011 11:05:52 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.170 mail-gy0-f170.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.160.170] ([209.85.160.170:56933] helo=mail-gy0-f170.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 0E/E8-06569-E0C36CE4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 06:05:50 -0500
Received: by ghrr20 with SMTP id r20so456458ghr.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:05:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=t1eaZ20qmPzlveXX7chKMI1eBBG0kJHzDtfSGuRYen8=;
        b=QTG6aKh3Dsc/011FWIcWiCRbJAmCUQZ3uoDAi9/814g/YrhEtcNByk7yEbE2Hs7GJd
         qQYGOZQW37jQTWDEKMw4WekhDTfcfO5hUgzqleMv2czsJPak2wUd0ykZeTCdz2fVS4Gb
         U6V+s0yqYnI0y8XH6XBvMua1lZsD6XYwHUcRE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.116.9 with SMTP id f9mr4002149yhh.0.1321614347724; Fri, 18
 Nov 2011 03:05:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.147.99.18 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:05:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1111180954250.5937@whisky>
References: <4EC578C9.4000408@ralphschindler.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1111180954250.5937@whisky>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:05:47 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU4FHG_PTezL+LbweftuRu4248Rgmo2HJLtSBFV=nNo9Lg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
Cc: Ralph Schindler <ralph@ralphschindler.com>, internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Changes to constructor signature checks
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

I strongly disagree, this encourages bad practices. We could however
reduce the error level to warning.

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Ralph Schindler wrote:
>
>> That said, we really should consider removing this limitation from const=
ructor
>> signature checking. =A0Not only is it a BC break, it doesn't make sense =
in the
>> context of PHP.
>
> I agree, we should not be having that check for constructors based on
> the points you raised.
>
> cheers,
> Derick
>
> --
> http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org
> Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php
> twitter: @derickr and @xdebug
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>



--=20
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org