Newsgroups: php.internals,php.pecl.dev
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56366 php.pecl.dev:8877
Return-Path: <tyra3l@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 84583 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2011 13:23:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 17 Nov 2011 13:23:44 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.170 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.170 mail-ey0-f170.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.170] ([209.85.215.170:55557] helo=mail-ey0-f170.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 8E/F1-06702-EDA05CE4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:23:42 -0500
Received: by eyg7 with SMTP id 7so1960524eyg.29
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 05:23:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=fUAnuVj8yc/f9Jf6yGDW8rlKRQqhEwd4LgVT0BI3iCQ=;
        b=sz42E+/FUIVQSSCficvdU+3imN3zD4018y79lpNDZYDgKop8koI2swe4ckPFrmsgJz
         dFq6xIjHsAAbI3idYcNST8MpDBGmNvxJ33jHa3nSVsk9cjpNw6EfDc0bYV+lZOGLqnQM
         HFkiafgU9eF642eWY/KF2T4RZT+1lGQVFzIsM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.67.5 with SMTP id p5mr5254210qci.148.1321536218279; Thu,
 17 Nov 2011 05:23:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.38.134 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 05:23:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAEZPtU5ECK3MNvuH8=mQYdF-t0LkjzSj3FMAeiL=j7qjTe5rcg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH-PCH5odG590A3S9pa7af-VFaMKdg25nOnY7AyzwmqRfKLttQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+5g0SJcMpMeEMiXUTo_H=bkUz76NigUE4tiKpwHj3vTffyzOQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH5w3Nwe5nK+wzJowfdJrxiJK3MYitp4E+Ki9fNzqXdVng@mail.gmail.com>
	<1321450474.29236.11.camel@guybrush>
	<8587F05B-1916-419E-AA95-D239EC77CAD3@roshambo.org>
	<CAEZPtU5ECK3MNvuH8=mQYdF-t0LkjzSj3FMAeiL=j7qjTe5rcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:23:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CAH-PCH5JeFEQS55M_Wr9nD7YMYp1S2fiuDCts9CrKj7+OkCCOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Cc: Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org>, =?UTF-8?Q?Johannes_Schl=C3=BCter?= <johannes@schlueters.de>, 
	Felipe Pena <felipensp@gmail.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>, 
	PECL Announce <pecl-dev@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64bff5ad9309204b1ee20fc
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] pecl sqlite
From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs)

--0016e64bff5ad9309204b1ee20fc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:

> hi,
>
> 2011/11/16 Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org>:
>
> > We need to make pecl/sqlite work with 5.4, as currently it does not.
>
> Why? We moved it out because it is not maintained anymore. As I agree
> that the concept of "move to pecl" for dead extensions is a bad idea,
> inciting users to continue to use with 5.4 instead of migrate their
> code to sqlite3 is not a good thing.
>
> > I forget the details (and the related patch) but did work on one with
> > Johannes many months ago. The last step (which failed) was to get
> > pdo_sqlite2 to work with the shared PECL variant, IIRC. Then, make a
> > release.
>
> It can be applied to svn. I suppose we should add a note as well in
> the documentation about this move.
>
> > Moving something to PECL should require that the PECL extension work wi=
th
> > the distribution that it was [re]moved from. Otherwise, it was not move=
d.
>
> I disagree, it should work with the distro where it was still present.
> If we stop to support something with a given release, there is no
> point to give the wrong message to our users.
>
> However, if someone feels like it is worth maintaining this dead
> library binding and keep alive for 5.4+, he can indeed go ahead, but
> unless we have such a person, I don't think we should release it or do
> anything else for this extension and 5.4.


I think that you are both right.
Either we shouldn't call it "moving it into pecl"(but dropping support or
something) or it should work with that version which introduced the move.

--=20
Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

--0016e64bff5ad9309204b1ee20fc--