Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56335 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30842 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2011 22:35:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Nov 2011 22:35:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=jerome@loyet.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=jerome@loyet.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain loyet.net designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: jerome@loyet.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.42 mail-fx0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.42] ([209.85.161.42:55853] helo=mail-fx0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 92/61-24592-819E2CE4 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:35:06 -0500 Received: by faan2 with SMTP id n2so1031219faa.29 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:35:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=loyet.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=H4fZFAiYPFtvTxmvsJ6Dhr+bPoo4L/xHAwSvfvKJP1s=; b=aU+YEIFmFfPrLq4SdnLAmI2V3ePxMZwkKi4rT4WCIPY1jbaSP35mqlJ1VCjO+Ti4RO ZqU5uOwMj1u4PENBlz/f9nCpXSuIGPARebDna1uy8HFalS+hH86nZntd+a8QpPkZd5L7 7zoFgfYGGvjPATWpWxqe4mg0vnW3v1YcWo4Io= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.217.73 with SMTP id ow9mr6291934obc.11.1321396501251; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:35:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.37.231 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:35:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:35:01 +0100 Message-ID: To: Adam Harvey Cc: php-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] remove FPM experimental flag on 5.4 From: jerome@loyet.net (=?ISO-8859-1?B?Suly9G1lIExveWV0?=) Le 4 juillet 2011 11:42, Adam Harvey a =E9crit : > > On Jul 2, 2011 11:27 PM, "J=E9r=F4me Loyet" wrote: >> I'd like to remove the FPM experimental flag in 5.4 and trunk. What do >> you think ? >> >> Maybe this needs a rfc/vote. > > I don't think it does, really. FPM has been in for a while, works well, a= nd > users clearly like it. I'd be happy just to say it isn't experimental in = 5.4 > and be done with it. > > Obviously I'm +1 if there is a vote! FYI, I'm removing the experimental flag on FPM now (5.4 and trunk). ++ Jerome