Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56230 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93140 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2011 14:20:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Nov 2011 14:20:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.170 mail-gx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.170] ([209.85.161.170:41382] helo=mail-gx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 99/04-01205-E8DDBBE4 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:19:59 -0500 Received: by ggnk4 with SMTP id k4so3381567ggn.29 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 06:19:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+/d4FCz8iRHGrJEX6a8jlXtU8eZjwUF70D8apj/t0bs=; b=kZiDKefpaq1YI3gVLU+wLPRllXyhVoI6AopAtSW/zWqb9PLV5vgYaaiF3a6TPBK82C EtAjC9Cte3S8jVv+FO6C/qSDQ7rYNwzGPrHhbceDGbUAHOX555SlVNdvYvTFny6C7326 wNYMhZQ1K6cVGNU6WUAwASkC8+4bp4VOX6SYw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.147.166.17 with SMTP id t17mr3306471yao.28.1320934796313; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 06:19:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.147.113.15 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 06:19:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <-4079824451837834664@unknownmsgid> <4EBB7A7B.9030303@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:19:56 +0100 Message-ID: To: Patrick ALLAERT Cc: Stas Malyshev , "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] SplClassLoader RFC Voting phase From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Patrick ALLAERT wrote: > You're mixing stuff here. > "RFC on PSR-0 support into PHP status" != "PSR-0 status" I do not. But we are confusing our old vision and what users are looking for. > However, *how* PSR-0 might be introduced into PHP, for those who uses > it, is for sure not ready yet and certainly not approved! > > I'm all for having a PSR-0 loader in the core of PHP, but if I voted > "No", that is because I think the RFC is not ready yet. That's a single non intrusive function representing what has been approved by many projects. Nobody is forced to use it nor does it enforce anything. > Some are blocking because they kinda feel forced if this is introduced. > Ignore those, PHP wouldn't have bundled ext/mysql for the same reasons > about 15 years ago. > > I guess that some voted "No" because of lack of consensus. What amazes me is this exact argument. We never had, in the whole PHP history, so many leading projects agreeing on something, together and propose it to the core. I, for one, have been waiting for that to happen for years (PEAR, etc.), and now that it is happening, what do we do? 'No thanks', for whatever reasons. That's so wrong. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org