Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56203 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 72057 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2011 20:17:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Nov 2011 20:17:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=nikita.ppv@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=nikita.ppv@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: nikita.ppv@googlemail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.42 mail-fx0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.42] ([209.85.161.42:35365] helo=mail-fx0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EA/50-02388-FCFDABE4 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:17:20 -0500 Received: by faan2 with SMTP id n2so2268365faa.29 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:17:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xFws64wsqY6yqBqdW/096Bjske/mWcp4mG5b5cwu/44=; b=SEVu/y5XJAEJy547qjl+E3fTS1KzZkSShka0IwzaBWXB4vSH/5Tuz5yqdeaBTUNoxi dFpVwZ6K/NFvGUYL/BmyLgSnNqXhHt7BB7tsNM7qJ/ugjvqQyWa1IWBtz6jlPYt7f2iI jmZ3C5AfOFd0V3BKJS7VTC94uQIyMO4PW6NmY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.106.163 with SMTP id gv3mr2626073lab.32.1320869836288; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:17:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.2.70 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:17:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EBADCE4.9030702@sugarcrm.com> References: <4EBADCE4.9030702@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 21:17:16 +0100 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: Ferenc Kovacs , PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] who can vote From: nikita.ppv@googlemail.com (Nikita Popov) On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: >> To summarize: The technical viability of a feature should always be >> determined >> through discussion before voting even starts. > It doesn't matter too much when it happens, as the purpose of the vote is to > see if the feature is needed/desired in the form that is proposed. That > doesn't mean it will actually be implemented - there are other conditions > for that, such as technical viability, willingness to contribute/support, > etc. It would be best if they would be closed before voting in order to not > waste time, but one should always realize they are necessary in any case, > voting or not. That's what I was trying to say. That implementability isn't much of a factor for voting, as it is determined by the discussion, not the vote. By that argument voting should not require that you know all Zend API calls by heart (a basic understanding of PHP internals might be helpful though), so a restriction to php-src isn't necessary from that point of view. >> So, I don't really know. In some way it does make sense to give php-src >> more >> voting rights, after all they do know internals better and are more >> engaged than >> other contributors. On the other hand it also is kind of unfair for >> everybody else > I'm not sure what you mean by "fair" here. PHP project is not some limited > resource that is in common ownership and should be fairly distributed > between owners. I think decisions in PHP should be taken by people that have > the most ability to take correct decisions that would make PHP more usable, > and it has nothing to do with fairness. I borrowed the term "fair" from Tyrael's response, though retrospectively it was a bad aspect to consider, as fairness or such isn't a precondition for good descisions. What I should have said is that in my eyes - as outlined in my other replies - I don't see any compelling reasons why one should distinguish between php-src contributors and the others. Nikita