Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56170
Return-Path: <nikita.ppv@googlemail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 97169 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2011 17:39:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 8 Nov 2011 17:39:13 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=nikita.ppv@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=nikita.ppv@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: nikita.ppv@googlemail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.42 mail-fx0-f42.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.161.42] ([209.85.161.42:43165] helo=mail-fx0-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 42/B0-28203-04969BE4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:39:13 -0500
Received: by faan2 with SMTP id n2so847995faa.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:39:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=l6ty1puOxZM/pr97+SEtQ1ss6lQqiwMTNchFEVqgVwI=;
        b=rvC6qmL2H2kE79uxqI1OoonPJbcjaCWqOXj3aLkTjrUGP4S7pu34S9akntSuH6mqoX
         tvGQcaSVwO0Grhv7AJHUUzx7Gt04RClIGHx29lDSV44rPqMumYnIv0TYuPVPNuxWqvTK
         GdyKXMxpVK3++gXAptKEAV7WTufheuVHXvUpo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.109.198 with SMTP id hu6mr9268374lab.11.1320773949426;
 Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:39:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.152.2.70 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 09:39:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAFp73Xvn2svxwSN79xQ6UEw=YZaegC5ekenSPPoYaw7=bQVXLg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALa-LwbbENc-ZQ=+5SJdA0P3Oa5mH6sJmvhYTm30J2p+9Sg5zg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EB81703.7030605@hoa-project.net>
	<CAFp73XtYWwQOVnHKdNtNhkNNg2EhoQN1S8ZDnJnQpMC1E31xXA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EB81C84.8010609@hoa-project.net>
	<CAFp73Xveea1e=atv4DTKqmcRG2H4Su1gvV70a1uxLJ4pR=GU6w@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EB820BB.2030009@lsces.co.uk>
	<4EB822D4.4060306@hoa-project.net>
	<CAH-PCH6JUB7a+JZmbbmMs9Fzj_4WvLtnJ=mKgbt-9gwzLj-O9Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EB89C36.5000503@garfieldtech.com>
	<4EB8A22B.8000607@lerdorf.com>
	<CAFp73XsmekJQddrxxyehMQkuZ6FWXb5_9pccVruZ7mNgHh2Xvw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAF+90c_PXBNXXemz6R2y2NUtKm0Nn37=vy5cvzqzQ5+jirKitw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFp73Xvn2svxwSN79xQ6UEw=YZaegC5ekenSPPoYaw7=bQVXLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 18:39:09 +0100
Message-ID: <CAF+90c-3EJd_9K9jvmsUCze_karW-tnwK01RL4GUzYRNMCvNkQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>, internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] SplClassLoader RFC Voting phase
From: nikita.ppv@googlemail.com (Nikita Popov)

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:28 PM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com
<guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> wrote:
> Because there's no need to bring to C a single foreach.
> Also, if you re-read the RFC, you'll see that SplClassLoader is
> extendable for personalized developer needs, such as an addAll or an
> APC lookup.
After your changes the RFC looks much more decent. I am still opposed
to the idea of this going into core (mainly because there is no
necessity), but now the implementation is somewhat more useful.

Nikita