Newsgroups: php.internals,php.qa
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56062 php.qa:65959
Return-Path: <tyra3l@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 55063 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2011 01:00:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 4 Nov 2011 01:00:14 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:63803] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 7D/C0-49824-A1933BE4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:00:11 -0500
Received: by ywb26 with SMTP id 26so2140891ywb.29
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=6bjPpkkhVmb89FnG1KaeHbT6bFo7ldzYt/P6zfUESO8=;
        b=VDDHtzeSCkyzDOUfQ/3Sq+7etx8UO9/4X7/FEDYDL+7jtVzd5miJCVC7Xqr0aP34SV
         X1300vFO/2fIbMbVXBM2zPZdCl8/0OCXbVG69mQGKohZ5X4dhq5DsQF8/DxnU+owzMwK
         bdTV+k8k0vKqsFTfO6nZm8ELFzYZBWw0AC3YI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.170.201 with SMTP id p49mr6111590yhl.106.1320368401808;
 Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.146.71.16 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 18:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH-PCH6O=Pj47BLeS5Hn=+DF96gogKAHMG9dAEWTpsw-Ws2jXg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4E66C906.7060402@sugarcrm.com>
	<CADNQb0XM1+Xn9peyv7uG3wZUz7WBNqOhcyyVmZKTADNXucfodw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH7_SKFckOYQt7vSJr063M9RA_zJGTGVc1Q+xjgW=hXu2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH5XdejMmO1d=LzupudsEQxT5rTw3ewPAKvcg9Pu7J9gGA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFst3WqTzSExTUK-KUoPgvL7djfr3A4_sd4GgmLJvakcpWy+_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH5fT4nknjyjqN4=Shp0dPiadZGg0mafOaX93qeDTgiSGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<F59ECA58-A69F-4DEE-8A47-41E3E71D2B9C@stefan-marr.de>
	<CAH-PCH4EU5V02kwQ4O_Yrd5qhudjqaztKxjM=m7GnrCyh89wAA@mail.gmail.com>
	<02FCF0AC-207E-4783-B590-E1F8150BD0E6@stefan-marr.de>
	<CAFst3WpbPKufEtJ60oCanz4dyCvG0HS-Fkie3E8ofv+=L4QDrw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH5J=m-9d-JiT3khrWQJTiRyYg-NSuzfUBSbBO=M2uZutg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+5g0SKjzshJdrKhcLkyYc3=wE830aPoSkHZWXTjvuU6rvfftA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH5d-2Dy03LC0aRy0dv6W2VWTxj7+ME9wqSko3qpYG1k1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EB316C2.3050000@lerdorf.com>
	<CAH-PCH4sWeHvWKiuEVjrCChgKFt6gHVxgPzcEwfbRY03TAuxnA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EB31CA7.6080008@lerdorf.com>
	<CAH-PCH7ZQ4GftOgOzvc3U=MQNRg1pUipK1qXY9p0QRo3QzYOLA@mail.gmail.com>
	<F11C78D5-9686-4289-80FF-3DDE17AE22EE@stefan-marr.de>
	<CAH-PCH6O=Pj47BLeS5Hn=+DF96gogKAHMG9dAEWTpsw-Ws2jXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 02:00:00 +0100
Message-ID: <CAH-PCH5UJs=ajD+158a+2nYkKSfm35XS_DwFzr46h-excyjtfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stefan Marr <php@stefan-marr.de>
Cc: Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>, Felipe Pena <felipensp@gmail.com>, 
	Klaus Silveira <contato@klaussilveira.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>, 
	PHP QA <php-qa@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf305640c98ffd5b04b0de394b
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] CI for 5.4
From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs)

--20cf305640c98ffd5b04b0de394b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Stefan Marr <php@stefan-marr.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi:
>>
>> On 04 Nov 2011, at 00:12, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> > I almost forget to mention, but the email notification also supports
>> defining different recipients for each event, so for example the commite=
rs
>> could still get the notification for each of their commits/builds until =
the
>> build is back to normal, that way the list wouldn't be spammed, but some
>> active contributors would be still continuously bugged.
>>
>> Does that meant that the committer could get an unconditional email with
>> the result of his/her commit?
>>
>> Sounds very reasonable to me.
>>
>>
> yep.
>
>
> --
> Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs
> @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
>

I set up the email notifications for the 5.3 build project:
it should send a notification to:
- everybody, for every build, regardless of the build result, who either
triggered a build manually through the web interface, or commited to svn
for that job since the last successful build.
- and to internals but only for the fixed or failure results.

if this works out, I will also set up the two other build and tests jobs
also. Of course we still have to agree and solve the failing tests
jobs(either picking a solution from my ABC list, or coming up with a better
alternative), else the commiters will start getting the still failing mail
for every tests build execution.

--=20
Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

--20cf305640c98ffd5b04b0de394b--