Newsgroups: php.internals,php.qa Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56060 php.qa:65957 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 46104 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2011 23:20:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Nov 2011 23:20:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@stefan-marr.de; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@stefan-marr.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain stefan-marr.de from 81.20.134.149 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@stefan-marr.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.20.134.149 vps-1012701-4512.united-hoster.de Received: from [81.20.134.149] ([81.20.134.149:43638] helo=vps-1012701-4512.united-hoster.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1E/A0-50864-EB123BE4 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:20:31 -0500 Received: from d51a4d67f.access.telenet.be ([81.164.214.127] helo=[192.168.0.23]) by vps-1012701-4512.united-hoster.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RM6a7-0005qV-Bp; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:20:25 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 00:20:15 +0100 Cc: Rasmus Lerdorf , Felipe Pena , Klaus Silveira , PHP Internals , PHP QA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: LA@mail.gmail.com> To: Ferenc Kovacs X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] CI for 5.4 From: php@stefan-marr.de (Stefan Marr) Hi: On 04 Nov 2011, at 00:12, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > I almost forget to mention, but the email notification also supports = defining different recipients for each event, so for example the = commiters could still get the notification for each of their = commits/builds until the build is back to normal, that way the list = wouldn't be spammed, but some active contributors would be still = continuously bugged. Does that meant that the committer could get an unconditional email with = the result of his/her commit? Sounds very reasonable to me. Best regards Stefan --=20 Stefan Marr Software Languages Lab Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr Phone: +32 2 629 2974 Fax: +32 2 629 3525