Newsgroups: php.internals,php.qa Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56056 php.qa:65953 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38352 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2011 22:33:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Nov 2011 22:33:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rasmus@lerdorf.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rasmus@lerdorf.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 209.85.161.170 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rasmus@lerdorf.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.170 mail-gx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.170] ([209.85.161.170:63065] helo=mail-gx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 7C/2F-50864-8C613BE4 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:33:45 -0500 Received: by ggnk4 with SMTP id k4so1256838ggn.29 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.197.20 with SMTP id u20mr12087405ybf.25.1320359621154; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.200.5] (c-50-131-44-225.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [50.131.44.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f32sm21155647ani.20.2011.11.03.15.33.39 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:33:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EB316C2.3050000@lerdorf.com> Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:33:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ferenc Kovacs CC: Felipe Pena , Klaus Silveira , Stefan Marr , PHP Internals , PHP QA References: <4E66C906.7060402@sugarcrm.com> <02FCF0AC-207E-4783-B590-E1F8150BD0E6@stefan-marr.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] CI for 5.4 From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) On 11/03/2011 02:26 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > We could set up the email notification any time, we would just have to > agree where to send (internals, php-qa, creating a dedicated mailing list?) > and when to send (as I added to the RFC, having failing tests can be a > problem from the notification POV). > We have to find a good middle way, else we will either miss the > notifications, or we will be overwhelmed, so people will just ignore it. Ideally they should go to internals if you can get them to be non-noisy. As long as it only reports a test status change from the previous run, hopefully that wouldn't create much noise. -Rasmus