Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56003 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 13701 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2011 10:27:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Oct 2011 10:27:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@schlueters.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@schlueters.de; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain schlueters.de from 217.114.211.66 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@schlueters.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.211.66 config.schlueters.de Received: from [217.114.211.66] ([217.114.211.66:48929] helo=config.schlueters.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 12/22-32552-7087EAE4 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 05:27:20 -0500 Received: from [192.168.2.230] (ppp-93-104-40-201.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.40.201]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by config.schlueters.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 378617722B; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:27:16 +0100 (CET) To: Pierre Joye Cc: PHP internals In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:27:11 +0100 Message-ID: <1320056831.5694.14.camel@guybrush> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 5.3.9? From: johannes@schlueters.de (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) Hey, yes, as said in a thread a week ago I agree. What about rolling RC1 this Thursday? Mind: As a result from 5.3.7 I will bug more projects to test it, be a bit more demanding than in previous "primary testers" mails (like in [1]), if anybody has some contacts for my "nag list" please tell me and I'll add them. Background: Response on "primary testers" had been quite low. I wanted to formalize a stricter rule on requiring some responses before release and have that in sync with 5.4, but after discussion wit 5.4 RM I decided to first check if response rates go up when bugging the project leads a bit. johannes [1] http://news.php.net/php.qa/65903 On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 15:20 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote: > Hi, > > It would be nice if we could begin with 5.3.9 asap. It is long over > due and there is already a very long list of bug fixes :) Any plan > already? > > Cheers,