Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55900 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 42515 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2011 14:39:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Oct 2011 14:39:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:62177] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 77/A0-39053-695D2AE4 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:39:19 -0400 Received: by ywb26 with SMTP id 26so2187405ywb.29 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:39:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=i2HqfUyJsE8RFxHJmopGx781vT7D+090HCK2JbbKH2E=; b=KIZraVHG4LJ5JqI3HmytQ/QWpEDJ43SLAS0XteszZiZvsHYBvjpKyhiXuiimy97l8P ppMS0jYNmGLRUQ69+b4H/CnPv98IrY+H6PGxsP2ZRu+D39BHBVsWkIJWNgOwNUwQ/KY2 ilnljr9uU48bmz98XQWkH/Tvx+9fSLhfCmAo0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.124.4 with SMTP id w4mr27299067yhh.30.1319294356195; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:39:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.170.17 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:39:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4EA2D317.7000806@lsces.co.uk> References: <1319230096-sup-4515@fewbar.com> <4EA2D317.7000806@lsces.co.uk> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:39:16 +0200 Message-ID: To: Lester Caine Cc: internals , Clint Byrum Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi, On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Lester Caine wrote: > > There is also a lot to be said for going with what is known to be stable for > an LTS release. Please do not begin with this discussion again. It is confusing for the readers and totally unrelated. There is no LTS in the release process RFC but every release has a fixed lifetime. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org