Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55897 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 36448 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2011 14:06:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Oct 2011 14:06:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:38162] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6D/10-33503-DEDC2AE4 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:06:37 -0400 Received: by ywb26 with SMTP id 26so2171098ywb.29 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:06:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SOvDOzhSvwJWiwzXuNliSXJsb9g2u/n7CsCts0N2msY=; b=TorfmPLagc2lWRryZYm023CTSLIGCt2vrISEj3CfXGpNomXwdBttpQU3H/bgPY7LK0 R/7bV8eVqfVTPkruUA6bK5anxKXk21zY0d4tsw8Y/u9gfNJTOEr8co2FhSgLVsBT+fwE fCcUY2LgTx0sNDRx+hy/kT0POHt4iehOuUm00= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.147.60.17 with SMTP id n17mr4040640yak.33.1319292393727; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:06:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.170.17 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:06:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1319230096-sup-4515@fewbar.com> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:06:33 +0200 Message-ID: To: Hannes Magnusson Cc: Clint Byrum , internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 22:52, Clint Byrum wrote: >> Hi everyone. I'm trying to plan things for Ubuntu's upcoming 12.04 LTS >> release. LTS stands for Long Term Support, and it will be supported by >> Canonical for 5 years. Because of this, I really want to ship a version > > Wouldn't you rather want to include 5.4? 5.3 will no longer be > supported by us shortly after your release.. So for the next 5 years > you will be including something that is already unmaintained? We did not decide yet that we will stop to support 5.3 right after the 5.4 release. And for one, I think we should continue to suport it (strict maintenance mode) for a year or two. We can't simply say "heh look, it is dead" as we got no plan until now. Things are easier for 5.4 and later as we have now a clear release life cycle (as defined in the RFC). Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org