Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55826
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.210.44 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH-PCH43YhBMBMT_17qe=W85cBM=dxh6dSVD6EShc5=cfCBPmA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimaAqhn8oG-zjh7VfSh6Y_=1xKUGV224MKXzKwG@mail.gmail.com>
 <90.D3.01713.97CB4FC4@pb1.pair.com> <CAH-PCH43YhBMBMT_17qe=W85cBM=dxh6dSVD6EShc5=cfCBPmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:59:17 -0200
Message-ID: <CA+5g0S+=8PJ3yxDgu+_2D_rkWqJ=rHwAN4WiKwS7Jj8e9p4RFg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Wallner <mike@php.net>, internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] new foo()->bar()
From: felipensp@gmail.com (Felipe Pena)

Hi,

2011/10/7 Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote:
>> On 11/26/2010 08:36 PM, Felipe Pena wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>
>> ...
>>>
>>> Other examples which describes the feature at
>>> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/instance-method-call
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Finally.
>
> it seems that it didn't made it to the trunk/5.4.
> is there anything holding things back? I think Dmitry mentioned
> checking for memleaks and such, but I didn't remember seeing anybody
> really against the idea.
>

There is no memleak from what I've tested. I only haven't a way to
prevent the 1 shift/reduce conflict added by the patch, which seems
harmless for our grammar though.


-- 
Regards,
Felipe Pena