Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55810 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 8019 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2011 00:06:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Oct 2011 00:06:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 207.97.245.123 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 207.97.245.123 smtp123.iad.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [207.97.245.123] ([207.97.245.123:33520] helo=smtp123.iad.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 8F/D1-20519-0002A9E4 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:06:24 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp52.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 32BD0240EB2; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:06:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp52.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id ADA04240EA5; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:06:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E9A1FFB.2090903@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:06:19 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Wallner CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4E8DC8B9.6070109@sugarcrm.com> <88.23.18205.842CE8E4@pb1.pair.com> In-Reply-To: <88.23.18205.842CE8E4@pb1.pair.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RM decision on BUG #55801 / FR #36424 From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 10/7/11 2:11 AM, Michael Wallner wrote: > So I can only see two solutions: > - either disallow serialize/unserialize in __sleep/__wakeup > - or revert r299770 So, what is the status of this? I think we better revert it for 5.4 and look for solution that does not mess up existing code. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227