Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55754 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67587 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2011 15:12:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Oct 2011 15:12:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:50103] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A3/00-01623-158609E4 for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 11:12:18 -0400 Received: by ywa8 with SMTP id 8so5032981ywa.29 for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 08:12:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hbwvpRzN/U2psg3rzZASRcM/6gI3H51BcATfdtiyHrw=; b=SDHFhhStK9IlAcQDcEktpTMPrLOeG0MvR2I0T5BxThFnXYklN0XIzUSabBC4AEBIdm oSl1j0AZqspWjD9S02jP0CKeAgPMExuS113eHSFWjrkkJ2IzmtNa9Id80LtdAjTs6dZ6 GrKmAFt81YIoEPdBEG6VoU6IEoVX6ni/fMRLc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.184.168 with SMTP id s28mr7093097yhm.31.1318086733879; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 08:12:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.169.18 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 08:12:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 17:12:13 +0200 Message-ID: To: Patrick ALLAERT Cc: Ferenc Kovacs , PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] php54 vote From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Patrick ALLAERT wrote: > The votes made on that topic where mostly done by people who obviously > haven't take care of the technical limitations nor having followed the > BC problems it generates. > That topic shouldn't have been voted at all. It was voted on the idea given that the tech issues and BC were solved, and that's a requirement for any RFC to be accepted. -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org