Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55747 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 27559 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2011 08:02:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Oct 2011 08:02:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.170 mail-gy0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.170] ([209.85.160.170:52141] helo=mail-gy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AE/31-13652-483009E4 for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 04:02:12 -0400 Received: by gyb11 with SMTP id 11so4858533gyb.29 for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 01:02:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AiV2JsSue7NxhhvvsY14GkhUadZvodoZwJhSYTy+peU=; b=M/zBNvObCS8V7whCZviD+5NGLRhc0MZOuNEUBym0wFUupelNGd0oSCT3uM56V6aJcz TwFpsUsJBv+o8JBG5OWWSBno2/llTHPCpuHesKCy8C7/0dz09mncUzOdPXmRbAcRzSVm EH1bW3rmqx1m7lK0LW9LcibW8wlbtvJLPJL/w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.177.66 with SMTP id c42mr14500313yhm.14.1318060929015; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 01:02:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.169.18 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 01:02:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E9001FC.2000507@lsces.co.uk> References: <4E9001FC.2000507@lsces.co.uk> Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:02:08 +0200 Message-ID: To: Lester Caine Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] little tweeking on the release process RFC From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Lester Caine wrote: >> I don't see how it is contradictory. SAPIs are self contained and >> can't harm another SAPI, that's why we added this clause. > > This is where the modular/bundled discussion comes in? No, it is not, absolutely not. Please do not hijack again this thread with this discussion, it is totally off topic. SAPIs are what makes possible to get PHP works in a shell, apache, fastcgi, etc. Thanks for your understanding, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org