Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55735 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 63455 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2011 18:29:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Oct 2011 18:29:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:63378] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E9/B2-42058-CF44F8E4 for ; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:29:17 -0400 Received: by ywa8 with SMTP id 8so4420772ywa.29 for ; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:29:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h0fn45ZY42JNlD/I40mGPREooeQK+Anqzyvz/xF7vkg=; b=OikHRQLvoFxYvy2y+vrEgY2s4Vji39H+7d5WUaOsuMU+kTkcTuFlVuvG/azsds08FD U5Wgf1ATXG5p26RuDPI9qV1GuwuJNdHAN67Q5PGLYjB8yMAJtRw1efsXvBgz+yeQ+sPz UJj+Ofn9cQjf+zgKgAVGxSdk6z3VUbgdwLdxg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.185.4 with SMTP id t4mr11963917yhm.121.1318012154161; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.125.13 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:29:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <90.D3.01713.97CB4FC4@pb1.pair.com> References: <90.D3.01713.97CB4FC4@pb1.pair.com> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 20:29:14 +0200 Message-ID: To: Michael Wallner Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] new foo()->bar() From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs) On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Michael Wallner wrote: > On 11/26/2010 08:36 PM, Felipe Pena wrote: >> >> Hi all, > > ... >> >> Other examples which describes the feature at >> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/instance-method-call >> >> Thoughts? > > +1 > > Finally. it seems that it didn't made it to the trunk/5.4. is there anything holding things back? I think Dmitry mentioned checking for memleaks and such, but I didn't remember seeing anybody really against the idea. --=20 Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu