Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55708 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80804 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2011 15:59:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Oct 2011 15:59:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dk@uw.no; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dk@uw.no; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain uw.no from 193.71.32.2 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dk@uw.no X-Host-Fingerprint: 193.71.32.2 mx-1.vendo.no Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [193.71.32.2] ([193.71.32.2:54938] helo=mx-1.vendo.no) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A3/05-41898-E50DD8E4 for ; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:59:27 -0400 Received: (qmail 29656 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2011 15:59:23 -0000 Received: from daniel.tbg.sysedata.no (HELO ?10.0.1.127?) (195.159.98.89) by mx-1.vendo.no with SMTP; 6 Oct 2011 15:59:23 -0000 Message-ID: <4E8DD05B.6060502@uw.no> Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 17:59:23 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.21) Gecko/20110831 Thunderbird/3.1.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stas Malyshev CC: "internals@lists.php.net" , Etienne Kneuss References: <4E7C764C.3000808@uw.no> <4E8DC9B4.7040809@uw.no> <4E8DCF7A.9050009@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: <4E8DCF7A.9050009@sugarcrm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Fix for bug #55754 From: dk@uw.no ("Daniel K.") On 10/06/2011 05:55 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > On 10/6/11 5:31 PM, Daniel K. wrote: >> A patch was appended, discussed, and improved, and I have uploaded a >> test-case, as well as a minimal patch that fixes the problem (attached) >> to the original bug-report. >> >> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55754 >> >> The patch still applies to trunk, and I think it should be applied to >> the 5.3 and 5.4 branches as well. > > As far as I can see, the patch looks good, so it can be applied to 5.4 > and trunk. If I don't hear any objections and nobody beats me to it, > I'll do it in a couple of days (a bit busy now). OK, thanks. But what about 5.3? there is no ABI issue with this, just a spurious warning that goes away. Daniel K.