Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55593 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 20141 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2011 22:43:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Sep 2011 22:43:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rasmus@lerdorf.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rasmus@lerdorf.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 209.85.161.42 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rasmus@lerdorf.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.42 mail-fx0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.42] ([209.85.161.42:62356] helo=mail-fx0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E2/07-11679-72ABB7E4 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:43:52 -0400 Received: by fxbb27 with SMTP id b27so3234831fxb.29 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:43:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.63.8 with SMTP id z8mr3818051fah.84.1316731428923; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:43:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.5.75] (79-98-74-44.sys-data.com. [79.98.74.44]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k26sm8948576fab.12.2011.09.22.15.43.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:43:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E7BBA23.2080001@lerdorf.com> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:43:47 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110906 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= , Clint Byrum , internals References: <4E790B82.6090805@akbkhome.com> <8C.A0.17510.E4DE97E4@pb1.pair.com> <1316615094.2810.5.camel@guybrush> <1316629502-sup-831@fewbar.com> <20110922134956.GA28577@panix.com> <1316709104-sup-2744@fewbar.com> <1316713382.1290.60.camel@guybrush> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: is_a() - again - a better fix From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) I don't see the harm in reverting back to the previous behaviour in the 5.3 tree. It's not like it will break code that has been fixed to work with the new behaviour. -Rasmus