Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55471 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 3084 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2011 08:48:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Sep 2011 08:48:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.83.54 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.83.54 mail-gw0-f54.google.com Received: from [74.125.83.54] ([74.125.83.54:39414] helo=mail-gw0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2F/DC-20496-56D037E4 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 04:48:37 -0400 Received: by gwj18 with SMTP id 18so3745404gwj.13 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 01:48:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kEfoOcLrGV4ep8gJ4zfPogfFD9E426LaVCUFYyVIsZg=; b=TI4wOoQEjM6O7Q03cmgcgIkNIyO4PSMXBoc6NrQJyBp9fqOdeoEw+lcXQiqL1/D+Zb 9vtqy4F8JWeZcOeKY7JnDbRl7ZN4Ghyrk3Xlp2s2kOvVWA1M99fX0UhCasKDN2n7ZXvy sOQtPxkyPjo/SI6/Mdx9EMkdYftrRdNDcIZPs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.146.192.28 with SMTP id p28mr1756189yaf.35.1316162915006; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 01:48:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.41.10 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 01:48:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E703FC5.5000204@sugarcrm.com> <4E724D27.9090704@sugarcrm.com> <4E727159.7070203@sugarcrm.com> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:48:34 +0200 Message-ID: To: Hannes Magnusson Cc: Stas Malyshev , PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 beta From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 23:44, Pierre Joye wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: >> >>> The problem is data may vary by CLDR version, etc. and keeping pace with all >>> variants on all platforms, etc. will be a nightmare. >> >> To have a couple of versions, say x.y, x.y+1 sounds reasonable and possible. > > Its not our responsibility to test the 3rd party library data, thats > for intl to test. It is not about validating the correctness of ICU itself but our binding or APIs usage. And to do that we have to deal with the ICU results. -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org