Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55461 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11365 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2011 21:44:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Sep 2011 21:44:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.170 mail-gy0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.170] ([209.85.160.170:33498] helo=mail-gy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CA/02-29375-0D1727E4 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:44:48 -0400 Received: by gyb11 with SMTP id 11so2888926gyb.29 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:44:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lMiJjxzWOo9cxQRF5pkZXL21uW5iIMbqvy51Mvpep4g=; b=Bon0mNR1en159yrGfKOrmHEc0QYnM8XtlHNM5kH9MDcMQQIE5O9q3cquC6GCWqvVY1 KELfF78p+GL4R3o59k6Jisu/AW3mgfqvio6kuC5+zWEE9OwjIrUugyGnLKZY+eNZoidi vNRq5FMogFoZhabP3dAQZD+PFFLBYh65YpdaU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.139.138 with SMTP id c10mr10317021yhj.62.1316123085694; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:44:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.41.10 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:44:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E727159.7070203@sugarcrm.com> References: <4E703FC5.5000204@sugarcrm.com> <4E724D27.9090704@sugarcrm.com> <4E727159.7070203@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:44:45 +0200 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: Hannes Magnusson , PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 beta From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > The problem is data may vary by CLDR version, etc. and keeping pace with all > variants on all platforms, etc. will be a nightmare. To have a couple of versions, say x.y, x.y+1 sounds reasonable and possible. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org