Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55457 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80384 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2011 19:08:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Sep 2011 19:08:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.203 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.203 smtp203.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.203] ([67.192.241.203:45504] helo=smtp203.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 8B/9C-29375-B2D427E4 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:08:28 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp10.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B78A22F000A; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:08:24 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp10.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 734EF1B839A; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:08:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E724D27.9090704@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:08:23 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hannes Magnusson CC: PHP Internals References: <4E703FC5.5000204@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 beta From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 9/14/11 1:25 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > Could you look at the intl tests? > I have similar failures the the gcov, plus couple of more I sent you > the other day. Yes, I will. From casual look it seems like they are caused by variation between ICU versions, I'll look into how to make tests better - though for some tests it may be hard to do... -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227