Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55444 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 2718 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2011 20:26:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Sep 2011 20:26:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:56110] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0D/60-32060-8ED017E4 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:26:16 -0400 Received: by ywa8 with SMTP id 8so1932357ywa.29 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:26:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=dydyijHCvRPjZWomGPESimXXHkW53/+0Ny8q8YcARAs=; b=p3BhmaWdaNXzFNRh+ztoB4wEbfzXfM01U5Ou3KTF1qURfziNUfyMCA8dPBWIdqzoyw ylcZcfr8v3fdaXK939kU9s8dLZFPzuNzVUshN5FMrPCAcXqCfqUCPqupivGPRVvqSY0t OOreoaHnqfo/wU4Zsqg0TYU2M2f63aqywDLpQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.68.26 with SMTP id q26mr428059yba.198.1316031974105; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.41.10 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:26:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 22:26:14 +0200 Message-ID: To: Alexey Shein Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Running mhash tests From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi, On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Alexey Shein wrote: > Should we delete these tests (and, maybe deprecate/move to pecl the > extension itself)? I don't think we should, they are here to make sure that the emulation layer works fine. > If not, I'd like to know how to run these tests. Maybe the skipif is wrong, as far as I remember there was an issue with seeing the "mhash" layer as being the mhash extension. Maybe we should change the skipif and uses function_exists instead? Have you tried it? -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org