Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55394
Return-Path: <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 73292 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2011 23:17:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 12 Sep 2011 23:17:40 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:53943] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 30/A1-17976-2139E6E4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:17:38 -0400
Received: by ywa8 with SMTP id 8so1846535ywa.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=pS/LZp/4tQ/65grbH+GXZkINwLynYw7Cs5Mbet2l9fw=;
        b=Nzb2Flk084QdKz9pBWWMKHLhMNKporWd+AQCEG+znJez6MSziqWJmN+tAwejyQq61z
         /h6JMxKzePV7uUtkDHg9DGmjjlSeUcg0ej0vNpxyTeGjzh1YXeNcf0RLaKkA5mUBIB/J
         G6ekSBV8pT4ZlV0o3uNXs1HpUZdWhz8U368Jo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.139.138 with SMTP id c10mr29861750yhj.62.1315869454796;
 Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.147.41.10 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E6E8DDA.3050806@sugarcrm.com>
References: <4E6D0B5C.8030907@php.net>
	<op.v1n0lttyidpuyk@cataphract.cata.lo.geleia.net>
	<4E6DF2A9.2040608@php.net>
	<op.v1o62vdcidpuyk@clk-0081.mshome.net>
	<a34fd1235c70a400f486a80665c1dc5d@mohiva.com>
	<op.v1pagqykidpuyk@clk-0081.mshome.net>
	<CADNQb0U4oQQ_9_Ho1Cq1Ej0T5OoxYWEi1vZphXfEZwpuuJKhgQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<op.v1pv5etoidpuyk@cataphract-old.dulce.lo.geleia.net>
	<4E6E8DDA.3050806@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 01:17:34 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU6Mp13doBkjxE0DD2VH8zK4basbonu3BXoKS1x7ftgFNg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Cc: Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt>, 
	"internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Factory for Stream Wrappers
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

hi!

I like the idea to improve this area. However I'm with Stas here. I do
not feel comfortable enough with this RFC to agree to get into 5.4 at
this stage. It is a sensible area and we are already late (because of
the tests) with the 5.4 release plan.

Next will begin in spring next year, not too far away from now :)

Cheers,

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 9/12/11 3:45 PM, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
>>
>> It's a change in behavior so it makes sense. Those operations are wrapper
>> operations and by their nature they are static operations, meaning a
>> stream instance is not required. See the difference between php_stream_ops
>> and php_stream_wrapper_ops. It would be a minor change.
>
> I must say I am feeling really uneasy about "minor changes" days before
> beta. For later though it may make sense...
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
> (408)454-6900 ext. 227
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>



-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org