Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55390
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.83.42 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4E6E4471.9090204@sugarcrm.com>
References: <CAJW__o2m7R2_UVi9ZJP9uX7_Xb+iC8-O+1-uXrSPN+DZAniyBw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E6966D2.6030804@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAJy+15xqZbCSK01+LSPR56uYvQMxRaBDRT533RTb91vvARLdrg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E6E4471.9090204@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:59:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU61HAKE3FDsckngwoKC+vPpUpExOe0zcAq+qGjQTn+6SQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Cc: Ilia Alshanetsky <ilia@prohost.org>, Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC in 5.4
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 9/12/11 5:09 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>>
>> The agreement to include apc in 5.4 is an old one, unfortunately the
>> action of doing was just missed. Also, inclusion of the extension
>> won't break any code since it is self contained...
>
> If it's an "old one", how comes nobody ever mentioned it during all the
> extensive process of naming features, voting, etc. and didn't bother to
> propose it?

There was a discussion and the conclusion was that APC was not ready
for inclusion. See my other reply.

> I don't feel good about first agreeing to a set of rules and then
> immediately starting to throw them away "just this time, just for this
> occasion". Why have rules and release cycles then?


-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org