Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55359 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82165 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2011 07:06:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Sep 2011 07:06:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.193 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.193 smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.193] ([67.192.241.193:40709] helo=smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C8/53-45650-FDD5C6E4 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:06:08 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp19.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4ABCD3C83E1; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:06:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp19.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id DC99F3C83F9; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:06:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E6C5DD6.4090203@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 00:05:58 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rui Hirokawa CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4E6C39AC.3000607@yahoo.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <4E6C39AC.3000607@yahoo.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] proposal for change the argument of parse_str/mb_parse_str From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 9/10/11 9:31 PM, Rui Hirokawa wrote: > I think the second argument of parse_str/mb_parse_str > should be changed from optional to mandatory. This would create BC problems. You can mess up you code with any function, I do not think it warrants BC break. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227