Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55323 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 44644 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2011 01:04:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Sep 2011 01:04:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=kalle.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=kalle.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.54 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: kalle.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.54 mail-vw0-f54.google.com Received: from [209.85.212.54] ([209.85.212.54:63357] helo=mail-vw0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E5/32-21888-F16696E4 for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:04:31 -0400 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so755444vws.13 for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:04:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=p/+l+cb1T2tUqiqeh0bBIuKtosucsnWU5LYj+6nSbJw=; b=LAgBkrBNkvoU90guYufU2ei4IUVDnFs7b2DxuWch0ty9DunEazE1VFUN8GURPvG2xO S+bdjZdpx/3Hlc07mfdpiGetnmS2cdZJRtAzyCdSwdC4M0LJ7jInfuiMESt9dgYVBmYI mFiIdNUgS54NYH9fts9MPwHfwOOEk/tDbkI7E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.25.65 with SMTP id a1mr1457146vdg.284.1315530267856; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kalle.php@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.106.210 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 03:04:27 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: RwOpHEYrDgHtRYK5GNe9wH7Y3EQ Message-ID: To: Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: APC in 5.4 From: kalle@php.net (Kalle Sommer Nielsen) Hi This have been a while since we had the discussions about APC in 5.4 (or in general extensions to move in and out of the Core, but more about that in another thread). http://markmail.org/message/4w6lcbunw3qfof3c I bought this thread up a while back and it had a general approval feeling among the core guys and those who participate in internal discussions. So I was wondering if we finally agree on moving APC into the core, or is it too "late" for that? As Rasmus has spoken of, then the newly built-in webserver will greatly help improving the code coverage for APC, while also bringing some more attention to APC from a developer perspective (other than those who dwell into pecl/). -- regards, Kalle Sommer Nielsen kalle@php.net