Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55229
Return-Path: <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 14270 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2011 15:00:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 5 Sep 2011 15:00:20 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.170 mail-gx0-f170.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.161.170] ([209.85.161.170:41937] helo=mail-gx0-f170.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 2B/58-64330-404E46E4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:00:20 -0400
Received: by gxk27 with SMTP id 27so3603529gxk.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 08:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=losCoTDVYxPdgbkO2wyEtqDzXcYD/c3UGDc53ZxzIj4=;
        b=bAE9WrEy9LKLNf/QLfj0NG3XEc8YJAQd8lidof94GGy0T3tOdZwocq7mGJhd+WIqQH
         ACUWkZMU+WAplhRyA4N3JruTymtEPy1hXICQaQDT0uuWGFXLA1eZhf3YPpBqi1xelMZY
         Se2ru8aSx8iKKf6Z1QGx/I284Fghaj5tSdSaM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.168.68 with SMTP id j44mr18742636yhl.32.1315234815636;
 Mon, 05 Sep 2011 08:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.147.35.13 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <462BE71C-65A9-4C77-8AA7-E8D0A84FEA20@roshambo.org>
References: <BA175FCA-75BB-43E6-BE2A-03D1997F6C15@roshambo.org>
	<op.vv4wq9pzidpuyk@clk-0081.clk-domain>
	<462BE71C-65A9-4C77-8AA7-E8D0A84FEA20@roshambo.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:00:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CADNQb0XPUTbRsBpO_6qvFqu7-MsORZAXcoTtCeX69ZFAL63rsQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org>
Cc: PHP Development <internals@lists.php.net>, Scott MacVicar <scottmac@php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] INF behavior
From: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com (Hannes Magnusson)

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 21:33, Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> There are differing opinions on this matter so I'll base a conclusion on current SVN:
>
> - Both (INF==INF and INF===INF) are true in PHP 5_4 because it's the correct behavior
> - PHP 5_3 will continue as is for BC reasons (INF==INF = false, INF===INF = true)
>
> So unless something changes then this is how INF will be documented. And please inform the documentation team if this changes. ;)


Did this change again or is the test for it still broken?

ext/standard/tests/math/bug45712.phpt is still marked as "XFAIL" with
the remark of the bug not being fixed.

-Hannes