Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55116 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 88468 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2011 21:30:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Sep 2011 21:30:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.143 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.143 smtp143.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.143] ([67.192.241.143:47698] helo=smtp143.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 36/0A-31460-80B416E4 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:30:54 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp24.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9357D180368; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 17:30:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp24.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 2EE77180362; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 17:30:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E614B00.7080902@sugarcrm.com> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:30:40 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ulf Wendel CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <1314966424.2150.26.camel@guybrush> <4E60F712.4010901@lerdorf.com> <4E612BBA.2000509@oracle.com> <4E612D70.70606@sugarcrm.com> <1314994484.2150.49.camel@guybrush> <4E613ECC.2010007@sugarcrm.com> <4E61401C.1060009@sugarcrm.com> <1314997040.2150.61.camel@guybrush> <4E6146D9.9050402@phpdoc.de> In-Reply-To: <4E6146D9.9050402@phpdoc.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Make mysqlnd default over libmysql in 5.4 From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 9/2/11 2:12 PM, Ulf Wendel wrote: > I think, such a statement is quite a big step towards your test > concerns, Stas. Ultimately, I still don't get what you (Stas) are after > with the test discussion. Have I missed any of your worries? My concerns is first and foremost to have unit tests passing and compatibility API issues sorted out - such as same functions producing different semantics on libmysql and mysqlnd. This is my primary concern, especially if we want to have beta anytime soon :) That said, talk about "removing one moving piece out of the test equation" and comparing libmysql support to universally unsupported and officially considered dead IE6 makes me worried, when it comes from mysql extension maintainers. Your clarification about it in this letter makes clear my concerns are unfounded, which is good. Let's now get back to the first part - the failing tests. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227