Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55111
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4E61401C.1060009@sugarcrm.com>
References: <1314966424.2150.26.camel@guybrush>
	<4E60F712.4010901@lerdorf.com>
	<4E612BBA.2000509@oracle.com>
	<4E612D70.70606@sugarcrm.com>
	<1314994484.2150.49.camel@guybrush>
	<4E613ECC.2010007@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAH-PCH6CxJ31qmsVDDSvF2NAX72hfJ0nTdYCe3+24Fv9L01eig@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E61401C.1060009@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 22:48:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CAH-PCH6vDQhkrK7YCj9xiv8FH9MRxk4yq2ehu_=fmM26ZorszQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Johannes_Schl=C3=BCter?= <johannes.schlueter@oracle.com>, 
	Christopher Jones <christopher.jones@oracle.com>, 
	"internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Make mysqlnd default over libmysql in 5.4
From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs)

On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wro=
te:
> Hi!
>
> On 9/2/11 1:41 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> I think you missed the referenced [1]:
>>
>> [1] Yes, we will still allow building with libmysql and we will fix bugs
>> reported there and we will verify it works but focus on mysqlnd, as
>> we're actually handling it already
>
> I did not miss it - I do not see what it means. Either we support both - =
and
> then for the matter of development and testing nothing changes - or
> something changes, namely "we remove one moving piece out of the test
> equation", the moving piece being libmysql - and "remove" means "remove".=
 I
> just don't see how you can have both of these things at the same time.

I think that Johannes means that mysqld would be the preferred or
baseline for the mysql tests.
maybe supporting IE6 would be a good metaphor: you could say that you
support every browser equally, or you could say that you write your
stuff for the modern browsers and tests it against IE6 and fix where
necessary.
Johannes, is this what you had in mind?


--=20
Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu