Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55080 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91560 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2011 10:43:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Sep 2011 10:43:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rquadling@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rquadling@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.177 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rquadling@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.177 mail-qy0-f177.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.177] ([209.85.216.177:59265] helo=mail-qy0-f177.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 17/00-25695-043B06E4 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 06:43:13 -0400 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so1656912qyk.8 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:43:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=vTA6vdQnVJmQ+24L1w6ZPulCvjh0M6x8LZ2FQiyoQco=; b=wD1jCkTPTpK6m75W1zytMSycbUqUbju+lbYE1c/UZ463hGfMA1jx/43jzk/85C8stT B633a9TFRSEJdTZk1VpCkPd6xOAmo9x8hgk4mt4kKwozls9XW8Dt8dq/+Nf7bxIHdXmX p5UakI9M53cAfOFVYqPRI9Tr0wBTjF0SuW2e8= Received: by 10.229.36.193 with SMTP id u1mr720315qcd.57.1314960188161; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:43:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.215.72 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 03:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: RQuadling@GMail.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:42:48 +0100 Message-ID: To: Pierre Joye Cc: Ferenc Kovacs , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: drop bison 1.x? From: rquadling@gmail.com (Richard Quadling) On 2 September 2011 00:23, Pierre Joye wrote: > It would be nice to get at least a little bit of the context before going in > any kind of arguing. > > For one the failing test happening after my commit was my mistake. It has > nothing to do with the bison versions but me having committed a wrong > expectf expression. However, the 1.x support was the reason why I made this > change. Instead of making it right I've updated my boxes with bison 2.x. > Lazy and better.1 > > That being cleared, anyone using 1.x will have noticed that the tests did > not pass. Fact is that it looks like I am the only tester using 2.x. Do you > have any example of supported systems still having only bison 1.x support? > > Also 1.x is 13 years old, I would very surprised to see anyone still using > such an old system with 5.3. > > Now, as stated earlier, my testing hosts do not have 1.x anymore and I won't > care about it anymore either. So basically nobody here takes care if it > anymore but let claim we do :) > > On Sep 2, 2011 12:04 AM, "Ferenc Kovacs" wrote: > The default build tools for building PHP on Windows uses Bison 1.27. http://windows.php.net/downloads/php-sdk/php-sdk-binary-tools-20110512.zip contains [2011-09-02 11:36:29] [D:\php-sdk-binary-tools-20110512\bin] [] >bison.exe --version GNU Bison version 1.27 -- Richard Quadling Twitter : EE : Zend : PHPDoc @RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY : bit.ly/lFnVea