Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55078
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain thelounge.net designates 91.118.73.15 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4E601642.3070704@thelounge.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 01:33:22 +0200
Organization: the lounge interactive design
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110831 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <CAEZPtU79urqOQpbdx-o8RUvvUc7Lha=hYw9NZKx3TbTh6AAsgA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEZPtU79urqOQpbdx-o8RUvvUc7Lha=hYw9NZKx3TbTh6AAsgA@mail.gmail.com>
OpenPGP: id=7F780279;
	url=http://arrakis.thelounge.net/gpg/h.reindl_thelounge.net.pub.txt
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enig8DD26C2BA1B4D3C16F22E298"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: drop bison 1.x?
From: h.reindl@thelounge.net (Reindl Harald)

--------------enig8DD26C2BA1B4D3C16F22E298
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

it seems fedora had never bison 1.x

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=3D1084

Am 02.09.2011 01:23, schrieb Pierre Joye:
> It would be nice to get at least a little bit of the context before goi=
ng in
> any kind of arguing.
>=20
> For one the failing test happening after my commit was my mistake. It h=
as
> nothing to do with the bison versions but me having committed a wrong
> expectf expression. However, the 1.x support was the reason why I made =
this
> change. Instead of making it right I've updated my boxes with bison 2.x=
=2E
> Lazy and better.1
>=20
> That being cleared, anyone using 1.x will have noticed that the tests d=
id
> not pass. Fact is that it looks like I am the only tester using 2.x. Do=
 you
> have any example of supported systems still having only bison 1.x suppo=
rt?
>=20
> Also 1.x is 13 years old, I would very surprised to see anyone still us=
ing
> such an old system with 5.3.
>=20
> Now, as stated earlier, my testing hosts do not have 1.x anymore and I =
won't
> care about it anymore either. So basically nobody here takes care if it=

> anymore but let claim we do :)


--------------enig8DD26C2BA1B4D3C16F22E298
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk5gFkIACgkQhmBjz394AnlR5QCeNqBIHQPLb4lD/BWCcbl1Urbu
ueAAn2XpWKnpvrOH+jrMz1IZlglBFxUp
=9jWs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig8DD26C2BA1B4D3C16F22E298--