Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55076 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31470 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2011 23:23:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Sep 2011 23:23:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:65251] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DB/02-13254-904106E4 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:23:54 -0400 Received: by ywb3 with SMTP id 3so2023558ywb.29 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:23:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BJcpxKJ/iuXoMr/oR6uSpHihUny/ev2HXLqlnI3KnL4=; b=cS0g9yeAAmNFO7IF/3N3kS5xfgQcuyrJ5MbHHLbmEhkjK0B4py4880o7nvnika/VLA DavZ5Igs1T8nPCSXV/Y4yD1/rTwJHuGp9bc3in5vhege4gGTcqYpQlBHGgMQakkf/ymK E++cPZf1dLHppXLtUVBN2L60uM6BjPI+KVkdQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.185.42 with SMTP id t30mr2449921yhm.56.1314919431368; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:23:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.182.15 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:23:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.182.15 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:23:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 01:23:51 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ferenc Kovacs , PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303ea4a89d70a804abe9897e Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: drop bison 1.x? From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) --20cf303ea4a89d70a804abe9897e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It would be nice to get at least a little bit of the context before going in any kind of arguing. For one the failing test happening after my commit was my mistake. It has nothing to do with the bison versions but me having committed a wrong expectf expression. However, the 1.x support was the reason why I made this change. Instead of making it right I've updated my boxes with bison 2.x. Lazy and better.1 That being cleared, anyone using 1.x will have noticed that the tests did not pass. Fact is that it looks like I am the only tester using 2.x. Do you have any example of supported systems still having only bison 1.x support? Also 1.x is 13 years old, I would very surprised to see anyone still using such an old system with 5.3. Now, as stated earlier, my testing hosts do not have 1.x anymore and I won't care about it anymore either. So basically nobody here takes care if it anymore but let claim we do :) On Sep 2, 2011 12:04 AM, "Ferenc Kovacs" wrote: --20cf303ea4a89d70a804abe9897e--