Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55074 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 18431 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2011 21:00:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Sep 2011 21:00:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:58907] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 45/70-13254-841FF5E4 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:00:19 -0400 Received: by ywb3 with SMTP id 3so1923831ywb.29 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:54:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/y0t+ZY6k6fC9qzF+G9g+b8uXt5oOYd6qYaeyv1acW0=; b=Ay8dJ/LsMICpxp38BDBKBXCwlnmYqiypW9ES3QtPPXPWMYhM8waRO5G5FR52m8aYcn U0gn6a1OslAtoYWX6fy7XayXKkeUpBuejNyAUsC/g4gYK5ckZFqVW/JyJx/4Xen0J5Nb Qi2Li+XwFXIe1rQi8LIH3r87mKgswCT8726V8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.42.15 with SMTP id u15mr527710ybj.163.1314910497310; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:54:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.182.5 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:54:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 22:54:57 +0200 Message-ID: To: Pierre Joye Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: drop bison 1.x? From: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com (Hannes Magnusson) On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 20:58, Pierre Joye wrote: > Please show me one system relying on it?=C2=A0 13 years old... > Your own test box before Rasmus pointed it out to you when you where changing the tests. Forcing people to upgrade this kind of software between bugfix releases doesn't give us anything other then annoyed users. > Even if the plan is to drop it in 5.4+ for now. Fair enough. > And yes the diff in the messages make testing harder as it should be. Oth= er > would have noticed it already as many tests fail because of that. So it works just fine? There are no security or related bugs in the older versions? Or even performance reasons? There is no reason for us to test error messages from third party software, and it doesn't cost us any more work to support it.. -Hannes