Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55068 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 243 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2011 18:44:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Sep 2011 18:44:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:54826] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 59/00-33826-692DF5E4 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:44:39 -0400 Received: by ywb3 with SMTP id 3so1818190ywb.29 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:44:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=E+qua4DJS++TVyH9f3Dnjkqo5aVycCWRAN3x9kp9K0M=; b=WOORgkNwwn2u7scYlzmr1ipDvn+Q+zzAgOx3mdOPN8x74MXFormPYMBicHFvpRswTg 4J0tW8iianjVNkOhGSAmlZhxsDbVS4Tz9zJvKE8L4OBX3DL/sBUsVuBzwX3ume7zmuSp 6kg6xLxVYMBzzxsAmZzQp/b2SZHBNVGzZVPgg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.146.192.28 with SMTP id p28mr157024yaf.35.1314902675918; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.182.5 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 11:44:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:44:35 +0200 Message-ID: To: Pierre Joye Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: drop bison 1.x? From: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com (Hannes Magnusson) Thats not something you do in a bugfix release. Is different error messages really the only reason you want to drop 1.x? Seems like a bad reason. Why are we testing error messages from a 3rd party software anyway? -Hannes On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 19:14, Pierre Joye wrote: > I will simply drop 1.4 support by Monday if there is no opposition. > > Cheers, > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It would help a lot to test the parser if we drop bison 1.x support. >> It won't change anything in the parser rules or in the code base but >> only the way we test it. Bison version 1.x has different messages than >> 2.x (formats and contents). It causes some tests to fail because of >> these different messages. >> >> I wonder if we could simply stop to support bison 1.x in 5.3 and later >> or at least in 5.4+. But if we do it in 5.4+ only it will be harder to >> maintain both tests synced and compared the results between the two >> branches (eventual BC breaks or similar breakages). >> >> Comments? >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Pierre >> >> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org >> > > > > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >