Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55009 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 44013 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2011 07:42:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Aug 2011 07:42:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=catch56@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=catch56@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: catch56@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.42 mail-bw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.42] ([209.85.214.42:56839] helo=mail-bw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1E/35-05523-BE24B5E4 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 03:42:36 -0400 Received: by bkd19 with SMTP id 19so3929296bkd.29 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:42:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AnxOGH+rcGCSwO3HOy3uYxAapGE1VYr5tnLiFR3UeEs=; b=JSgEPXxjmtQUSu0ET4CkgYekcLIfaEm9MH2dWpni8PuVM5Jb7Jlzrt7k6tHVrvF88c BJhCVoV5qRRnKa4mBlAkDDjKncsg4Pm88QsbefdJdzweSq9aAjcwk2bsb61+pp3kUt45 V7et6Hcz/I2dlS1tthJsM6gj6RK52FaXj/9xk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.13.82 with SMTP id b18mr2037697bka.121.1314603752394; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.102.65 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:42:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E5B423A.1080007@lerdorf.com> References: <4E5B24DD.10903@sugarcrm.com> <4E5B2C49.3030303@lerdorf.com> <4E5B3E8C.1040308@sugarcrm.com> <4E5B423A.1080007@lerdorf.com> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:42:32 +0900 Message-ID: To: Rasmus Lerdorf Cc: Stas Malyshev , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c35faae902504aba009c6 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 beta From: catch56@gmail.com (Nathaniel Catchpole) --0015174c35faae902504aba009c6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Unless test failures are critical, it seems worth either commenting out or converting to xfail ones that can't be immediately fixed. That gives a 0 fail baseline to work from for detecting regressions, and test failures should be associated with bug reports anyway so it's not like they'd get lost forever. Nat On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > On 08/29/2011 12:23 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On 8/28/11 11:06 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > >> I would really like to see the number of failed tests hit 0 before we > >> even consider a 5.4 beta release. It shouldn't take that long to fix the > >> remaining tests. I'm down to 48 with just about everything enabled on my > >> Ubuntu laptop here. They are listed here if you are curious: > >> http://codepad.org/jtVeWgao > > > > It'd be a great idea to get 0 fails. Could we do it by Wed? ;) > > I don't know, but the release schedule relies on us fixing outstanding > issues. Given our recent history, failing bugs are, and should be, > outstanding issues. > > -Rasmus > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --0015174c35faae902504aba009c6--