Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55008 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 42689 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2011 07:39:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Aug 2011 07:39:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rasmus@lerdorf.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rasmus@lerdorf.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 209.85.210.43 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rasmus@lerdorf.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.210.43 mail-pz0-f43.google.com Received: from [209.85.210.43] ([209.85.210.43:61388] helo=mail-pz0-f43.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 91/F4-05523-0424B5E4 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 03:39:45 -0400 Received: by pzk1 with SMTP id 1so8510966pzk.2 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.172.16 with SMTP id u16mr2020726wfe.286.1314603582146; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.65] ([75.51.73.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i1sm17338702pbi.10.2011.08.29.00.39.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:39:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E5B423A.1080007@lerdorf.com> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:39:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stas Malyshev CC: PHP Internals References: <4E5B24DD.10903@sugarcrm.com> <4E5B2C49.3030303@lerdorf.com> <4E5B3E8C.1040308@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: <4E5B3E8C.1040308@sugarcrm.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 beta From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) On 08/29/2011 12:23 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > On 8/28/11 11:06 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >> I would really like to see the number of failed tests hit 0 before we >> even consider a 5.4 beta release. It shouldn't take that long to fix the >> remaining tests. I'm down to 48 with just about everything enabled on my >> Ubuntu laptop here. They are listed here if you are curious: >> http://codepad.org/jtVeWgao > > It'd be a great idea to get 0 fails. Could we do it by Wed? ;) I don't know, but the release schedule relies on us fixing outstanding issues. Given our recent history, failing bugs are, and should be, outstanding issues. -Rasmus