Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55003 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 27931 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2011 06:06:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Aug 2011 06:06:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rasmus@lerdorf.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rasmus@lerdorf.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 209.85.210.43 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rasmus@lerdorf.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.210.43 mail-pz0-f43.google.com Received: from [209.85.210.43] ([209.85.210.43:48726] helo=mail-pz0-f43.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 4E/52-05523-F4C2B5E4 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 02:06:09 -0400 Received: by pzk1 with SMTP id 1so8390619pzk.2 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.158.9 with SMTP id g9mr2347857wfe.282.1314597964712; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.65] ([75.51.73.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i1sm17046966pbe.1.2011.08.28.23.06.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E5B2C49.3030303@lerdorf.com> Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:06:01 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stas Malyshev CC: PHP Internals References: <4E5B24DD.10903@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: <4E5B24DD.10903@sugarcrm.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 beta From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) On 08/28/2011 10:34 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > According to our release plan, we are planning to release the 5.4 beta > this week on September 1st, which means it'll be packaged on Wednesday > Aug 31st. If you have any TODO items you want in, please do it before that. I would really like to see the number of failed tests hit 0 before we even consider a 5.4 beta release. It shouldn't take that long to fix the remaining tests. I'm down to 48 with just about everything enabled on my Ubuntu laptop here. They are listed here if you are curious: http://codepad.org/jtVeWgao If each one of us attacked just one of these over the next couple of days, we'd be done. At the very least, if we can't come up with a good fix and there is a good reason for not fixing it before the beta, the test should be moved to xfail. -Rasmus