Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54991 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28669 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2011 08:01:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Aug 2011 08:01:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.123 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.123 smtp123.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.123] ([67.192.241.123:48545] helo=smtp123.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 02/40-21897-4E5F95E4 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 04:01:41 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp12.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9ADA73C03CB; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 04:00:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp12.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 415B13C0304; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 04:00:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E59F5BA.8090103@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 01:00:58 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sebastian Bergmann CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4E58AF88.9010704@php.net> In-Reply-To: <4E58AF88.9010704@php.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Cannot build ext/intl on Fedora 15 From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 8/27/11 1:49 AM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > note: '__gxx_personality_v0@@CXXABI_1.3' is defined in DSO Judging from a quick search this is caused by libstdc++ missing from link line, and can be fixed by adding it, but I have no idea what's special with new Fedora (i.e., I think some new gcc stuff, no idea what) or why our autoconf magic didn't do what it was supposed to do. Hope autoconf magicians can shed some light on this :) -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227