Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54935
Return-Path: <kalle.php@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 29409 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2011 12:47:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 25 Aug 2011 12:47:11 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=kalle.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=kalle.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.42 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: kalle.php@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.42 mail-vw0-f42.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.212.42] ([209.85.212.42:44606] helo=mail-vw0-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 66/35-00227-E44465E4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:47:11 -0400
Received: by vwl1 with SMTP id 1so2133989vwl.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 05:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=uoQBUx5MYnrrbeq5sBu6W0i3m9q1GYhB30BWZFhwWS0=;
        b=vYpv3XdC2X7eRCre1yPz3ReeOV7i6unbdrWPK4tcnEITnCj2YRMoKPAXggp541sDDk
         N6Bp9JFFfc7C11UNlsEA8COlyQm+wzNGQGxeY7Z6ybM0nj2vlGMJVnKQSdMtmMlSBz0h
         3f/V9f2MmZGOysoVg+ZLZ2LwOM/sPzx/yynWg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.38.70 with SMTP id a6mr2042969vce.1.1314276426886; Thu, 25
 Aug 2011 05:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: kalle.php@gmail.com
Received: by 10.220.158.213 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 05:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E5642F7.9060702@php.net>
References: <4E5619ED.40609@php.net>
	<op.v0rpkrkridpuyk@cataphract-old.dulce.lo.geleia.net>
	<4E5642F7.9060702@php.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:47:06 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: u4VE-q5zRDOb5lxKqEfoHE9YWjI
Message-ID: <CAJW__o0DYyF0QnH3Sa5J+C2Dtytq1G0mVZdEj6zuW9_=6m0Dnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Bergmann <sebastian@php.net>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ReflectionClass::newInstanceWithoutConstructor()
From: kalle@php.net (Kalle Sommer Nielsen)

Hi

2011/8/25 Sebastian Bergmann <sebastian@php.net>:
> =A0Good point. How would I implement such a check?

Speaking of which, wouldn't it be easier to check all our internal
classes for such failures and fix them accordingly with this addition
(Fix the dont-crash-without-calling-constructor)?

We could do like that of above and cast an exception instead of
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR (as I believe is being cast now) in 5.4.

--=20
regards,

Kalle Sommer Nielsen
kalle@php.net