Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54922 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90885 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2011 09:28:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Aug 2011 09:28:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain hoa-project.net from 87.106.212.190 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 87.106.212.190 s15355703.onlinehome-server.info Linux 2.6 Received: from [87.106.212.190] ([87.106.212.190:39179] helo=s15355703.onlinehome-server.info) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 63/53-06524-9C5165E4 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 05:28:42 -0400 Received: from hwhost.local (85-218-15-56.dclient.lsne.ch [85.218.15.56]) by s15355703.onlinehome-server.info (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 73FF5E4018; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:28:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E5615C6.1050702@hoa-project.net> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:28:38 +0200 Reply-To: ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans CC: Stas Malyshev , David Soria Parra , "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4E556A0B.4010406@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Choosing a distributed version control system for PHP From: ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net ("Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa") On 25/08/11 11:15, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Stas Malyshev wrote: > >> On 8/24/11 2:03 PM, David Soria Parra wrote: >>> after 3 weeks of discussion, I think we are ready to start voting on >>> the DVCS RFC. If you think something is missing or should be >>> explained in more detail, let me know. >> I'm not sure choosing DCVS by vote is actually a good way to go here. >> I think we need much more input from people that maintain all the >> infrastructure we're using now and would be doing the move. If we >> don't have people committed to making it happen majority-based vote is >> useless IMHO. > I agree, and I also think that before people can make a choice they need > to have played with all the options. Just picking "git" because that's > what you heard of and what all the fan boys like is *not* the correct > way to go. In order to make a choice, and even consider switching away > from SVN, something that *works* just fine, you need to know the systems > (ie, git and hg). +10. I think a vote is prematured right now. Cheers. -- Ivan Enderlin Developer of Hoa http://hoa.42/ or http://hoa-project.net/ Member of HTML and WebApps Working Group of W3C http://w3.org/